We choosed to defend the dolphins' cause through this video promoting the Dolphin Safe & Dolphin Friendly's logo:
(some parts in our video are tailored from <THE COVE> and <ANIMAL WORLD>)
§ What is our eco label? What is its cause? What are the workings?
Our group has
chosen the ecological label Dolphin Safe & Dolphin Friendly.
Although the International Dolphin harvesting Commission banned
commercial dolphin harvesting in 1986, some countries still refuse to stop its
activities of slaying the dolphins.
"Without doubt the biggest threat to dolphins comes from
man." Let us illustrate the social causes behind it.
1-
Food source
The dolphins are killed to be sold as meat in markets and
restaurants. Whale and dolphin meat is big business in Japan despite the fact
that dolphin meat is heavily contaminated with mercury, the dolphin meat, they
hold the belief that eating that is an essential part of their food culture.
There is even a time that the Japanese government provides free dolphin meat
for the primary school students.
2-
Commercial harvest
Another major reason that dolphins are slayed is related to business
use.
If 30 dolphins are hunt, only one of them can meet the standard of
performing on the stage in Japanese, the country that carries out the largest
hunt in the world. Then the other 29 dolphins, which have not been chosen,
would get killed in the end.
3-
Science studies
Dolphins are also killed for the use of “science studies". Some
people claimed that they have to kill the dolphins in order to have a better
understanding of their age, gender, food, procreation situation, heredity
and the capacity of gastrostomy.
4-
Disadvantage of modern fishing
The modern fishing fleet harvests the seas indiscriminately. It does
not distinguish between fish and marine mammals, and it is quest for increased
efficiency, slaughters thousands of dolphins each year drowned in nets. As the
world's fish stocks become more depleted from over-fishing, there is a danger
that human's pursuit of protein food will lead to a more determined capture of
dolphins to satisfy their demand.
The impacts are:
1)
Dolphins’ extinction
Worldwide, dolphins face a variety of impacts that threaten their
existence. These threats are mainly a result of human activities.
Every year, approximately 22,000 dolphins in Japan and small whales
are cruelly slaughtered in the bays of numerous coastal towns. In recent
history the Baiji, also known as the Yangtze river dolphin, was declared
extinct. Other species like the Maui's dolphin are on the brink of extinction
due to entanglement in fishing gear. The Maui's, a sub-species of the Hector's
dolphin found in the waters of New Zealand, teeters on the brink with estimates
suggesting less than 100 of these dolphins remain in existence.
2)
Harm the ocean ecosystem
Since the scale of dolphin harvesting is too large, it is difficult
to estimate the harm to ocean ecosystem, which has become a global
environmental issue now.
The workings of the ecological label are:
Nowadays,a growing number of people know the importance of protecting
dolphins, but as the article “Telling Tales” written by Stephen Denning in 2004
(HBR) mentioned, “Analysis might excite the mind, but it hardly offers a route
to the heart-and that's where we must go to motivate people”. It is time for
the ecological label dolphin safe to take actions, to persuade, to motivate the
public..
Actually, they will conduct the following three steps, in order to
arouse people’s awareness and persuade them to protect the dolphins.
Ø Step 1
The Commerce Dept. has released an official “dolphin safe” mark for
tuna labels which threatens the current Dolphin Safe standards for tuna and
promises to mislead consumers.
Ø Step 2
In order for tuna to be considered “Dolphin Safe”, it must meet the
following standards:
1. No intentional chasing, netting or encirclement of dolphins
during an entire tuna fishing trip;
2. No use of drift gill nets to catch tuna;
3. No accidental killing or serious injury to any dolphins during
net sets;
4. No mixing of dolphin-safe and dolphin-deadly tuna in individual
boat wells (for accidental kill of dolphins), or in processing or storage
facilities;
5. Each trip in the Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean (ETP) by vessels
400 gross tons and above must have an independent observer on board attesting
to the compliance with points 1~4 above.
Ø Step 3
Earth Island urges consumers to avoid buying any tuna in the US that
carries this logo.
Please feel free to visit these websites:
§ Why is our video convincing?
The Ethos apex of the
triangle is reinforced by the presence of the logo ‘SAFE’ of our label and the
expression of sincere gratitude to the “first line warriors” at the end of the
video. It is an official label, recognized and well-known whose credibility is
very high. The logo is synonym of respect of dolphins and their close
environment. We thought it was important to clearly show the logo of the label
in this video to get a credible and trustful video and so increase our
persuasive power. Indeed, as we can read in “The necessary art of persuasion”
by Jay A. Conger (HBR), in business many managers “overestimate their own
credibility” and are consequently not persuasive. That’s the reason why we
wanted to show the serious of our clip with the logo.
The Logos aspect (consistency and logic)
of our persuasion is assured by different elements.
First, the video is
extremely simple to understand, there are no subtleties and there is no need to
read between the lines. Why did we choose simplicity over humor, subtleties or
second degree? Because we are looking for a large change in attitudes,
behaviors and also a general awareness.
In the article “Change
through persuasion” by David A. Garvin and Michael A. Roberto (HBR), we are
here in the first stage of a persuasion campaign: convincing the change is
necessary.
We used some other tools such as:
-
The repetition of the structure,
-
The contrast between images of free happy dolphins swimming and dolphins
in a blood bath,
-
The contrast of nice music and dark music (corresponding to the images),
-
The use of buzzy words such as pestics, kill or heavy metals.
Plus, to increase the
persuasion, we use real extracts from movies concerning the topic of dolphins:
The Cove and Animal World.
Finally, we put the accent on the Pathos component
of course. This is a specifically important one in our case. Our target is
broad and even if dolphins are generally loved and a general empathy for
dolphins for their physical aspect and their supposed sweetness exists, people
really ready to give money or act are not so numerous (at first only people
really crazy about dolphins will concretely act and not just say “it’s sad”).
We are majorly facing a
passive audience and so we need to capture their attention in order to engage
their mind in a second time. Thus, playing with dark images and make them feel
bad for the dolphins is a good way. We are playing on worry (about dolphins’
extinction), horror (blood) and sadness.
Our objective is to, for
instance, convert dolphins’eaters to stop eating them or to activate some quite
sensitive people to really take some actions to support our cause. Of course,
the video is also useful to reinforce the behavior of dolphins’ lovers who are
already involved in their protection.
Our strategy of “kissing” could eventually
have the consequence to over simplify our message but we think the delivery of
the message is simple but the cause is not so simple. So it can work.
§ Why is this video effective
in HK?
We truly think our video
can affect Hong Kong people.
First because dolphins are
part of Hong Kong sightseeing spots:
-
At Ocean Park Hong Kong,
-
Through excursions to see pink dolphins http://www.hkdolphinwatch.com/
On the top of that, we can
guess in Hong Kong, people are already sensitive to the beauty of dolphins and
feel kindness for them. They regularly see advertisements with dolphins, etc. The
closeness of dolphins for Hong Kong people will be a great good point for our cause
and our video.
Secondly, Hong Kong people
live close to areas where there is a consumption of dolphin meat, such as
Japan. Thus, they concretely understand it is a real fact (more than European
people for example for who consuming dolphin meat looks a bit unrealistic).
Also, it exists a real sensitivity
for charity in Hong Kong as we can regularly see in the streets. WWF Hong Kong
is very active.
Plus, as we can read in “Nature
needs a voice in Hong Kong to protect Chinese white dolphins” by Michael Lau in
South China Morning Post on the 18 May, 2013, the press informs citizens about
this and about how much it is important to take it seriously, like many
ecologists confirm.
References:
http://www.seethewild.org/2520/dolphin-threats.html
http://www.idw.org/html/dolphins_in_danger.html



1 comments:
I rarely watched documentary about Dolphins, your video gives me chances to touch on this. Thanks for your great videos. The flows are smoothly and help to educate us how to protect them while telling us the real situation of how Dolphins face now.
I agree with the Logo, Simplicity that your messages are simple and clear. You also showed the contrasting with healthy Dolphins swimming in the sea with the Dolphins being killed by fishermen.
In your last part of the blog, you mentioned that there are Chinese White Dophins in HK. In my opinion, you could show more those kinds of Hong Kong dolphins’ pictures and telling more how to contribute to protect them that could even appeal us. This could help to increase the similarity and empathy of ethos to us. Also, I saw the WWF website provoking the donation of protecting dolphins (http://www.wwf.org.hk/en/whatwedo/conservation/species/chiwhitedolphin/). As the decreasing number of Chinese White Dolphins is one of our HK environmental issues, which talks more on this area might be even powerful to contribute to HK society.
Post a Comment